왕초보영어

└영자신문읽기[초급] 영어초보자를 위한 영자신문 읽고, 이제 영어로 세상을 만나보세요!

해커스톡_10분의기적패키지이벤트

[초급] 영자신문 읽기

페이스북 보내기 트위터 보내기 친구들에게 공유하기

How Far Do We Go?

As human beings, we all have “rights.” Some are obvious, some not so. There are newly recognized rights that we have fought to get. One of those that are now being debated is the right to be forgotten. The right to be forgotten ensures individuals the right to request their information to be either deleted from the web database or become unsearchable.

As the name itself suggests, the right to be forgotten is a “right” to be protected. It is distinct from privacy rights. Privacy rights deal with information that is not publicly known, whereas the right to be forgotten involves publicly known information as well. It includes photos and videos of oneself once publicly known. If there is information containing data about him/her that the individual wishes to be removed, then it should be granted based on this right.

There is criticism against the right to be forgotten. If this right is recognized, it may violate one of the most important human rights ― freedom of speech. It could also constitute censorship and a reduction in the freedom of expression.

This right would also make the search results biased, which hurts the neutrality of the Internet. Information shown on search engines would only show the information people want to see, not the unbiased truth.

Also, big data companies would have to go through great lengths to identify third parties with other people’s information to remove it. It would also mean that these ‘big’ data companies many not be as big as they were, with a vast number of information people would request to be eliminated.

On the other hand, people argue with these criticisms saying that the web was not so unbiased before. They claim the net is a big fused storage containing numerous information written by billions of people, so it cannot be neutral. The right would not change the neutrality of the web.

Moreover, as stated before, it is a “right” and it needs to be kept. The information that a person can erase can only be about him/herself and not somebody else’s, so why oppose the right to be forgotten? Everyone has a past that they want people to not see, and this right enables them to make a fresh, clean start.

There is much debate about the right, whether it should be kept or not and to what extent should we allow the obliteration of our past? Still, the question remains: how far do we go to protect the right to be forgotten?

질문&어휘 문법TIPs 해석
questions

Debate: How Far Do We Go?

 

The right to be forgotten should be protected as it is related to protection of privacy. As the internet was never neutral, it would only do better by helping pick out inaccurate or outdated information. But some issues remain to be discussed as it might restrict the freedom of speech, result in censorship, and may harm neutral search results. 


Pros

1. Individual's privacy

2. Inaccurate or out-of-date information

3. The internet was never neutral in the first place


Cons

1. Restricts the freedom of speech

2. It could result in censorship

3. No neutral search results

vocabularies

obvious 분명한, 확실한

 

ensure 보장하다

 

distinct 뚜렷이 다른, 별개의

 

grant 허락하다


censorship 검열

 

neutrality 중립성

 

unbiased 선입견 없는

 

obliteration 말소, 삭제

 


자료제공 EDU TIMES EBS english 컨텐츠 제공

전체게시물
번호 기사목록 날짜 조회수
353
2020-04-03 5739
352
2020-03-31 5268
351
2020-03-27 8271
350 2020-03-24 8088
349
2020-03-20 13375
348
2020-03-17 8300
347
2020-03-13 7980
346
2020-03-10 6240
영어회화 10분의 기적
무료강의 보기
인강 미리보기
학원강의 보기
최신 Ap뉴스 청취해설강의
무료강의 보기
인강 미리보기
학원강의 보기
최신 Ap뉴스 받아쓰기
무료강의 보기
인강 미리보기
학원강의 보기
영어회화강의
무료강의 보기
인강 미리보기
학원강의 보기

왜 해커스 빡센 스터디에 열광할까

실시간 정답확인

영어회화,기초영어,기초영문법,영어공부혼자하기,기초영어회화,생활영어,영어회화책미친환급패키지